CDROM

ldavidson@brobeck.com
Date: 05/19/94


          Hello fellow law listers....

          As I've been reading the issues (and responding to a few
          posts) regarding these newest publishing tools, I have come
          to realize a few things that I have not considered
          before so I thought I'd share them w/you all. Sorry if this
          drones on a bit......

          CDROM technology is still in its infancy. New technologies
          come to us so quickly now that we all forget just how
          complex these technologies really are. We see an exciting
          new product and due to the industry hype-spinners, we try
          and embrace these new technologies with optimism - only to
          have our preconceived notions (fueled by those drs. of
          spinology) shattered by a few lousy products riding the
          hype and some poorly represented pricing structures -
          especially when the communication between vendors and their
          customers is NOT clear and NOT concise and with very little
          statistical justification to back the vendors
          pricing.

          When a truly excellent product finally
          comes our way (yes I know - we're all waiting) - or even a
          fairly good product, of which there are a few, the
          benefits over hard-copy publishing will be enormous.
          Hypertext searching and data linking are in pre-infant
          stages at this time and as programmers get better at
          providing truly powerful links between sources - and
          multitasking between different resources links various
          hypertext capacities together to access different
          information on the same subjects and all related fields -
          well, the benefits will be enormous to everyone - not just
          our profession, but to the public at large.

          As the CDROM industry grows and evolves I can only predict
          that the information industry will be drastically changed by
          these products. One of the constant, ongoing battles we all
          have is space consideration - shelving availability. I know
          how much trouble we all go through to constantly manipulate
          our libraries to facilitate new materials and shifting
          collections. The technology is close to the point where the
          whole Federal Reporter series will be available in a
          networked, multi-user access WITH cite linking to other
          reporter series to support most common cites linkage. In
          other words, pretend you are looking at a case in F.Rep 2nd
          and there is a cite to a bankruptcy reporter case - you
          highlight the cite, press enter, and bang - a hypertext link
          to that case!

          OK - so this is all well and good. How does all society
          benefit? Think of how many libraries subscribe to these
          reporters around the country. Think now of the forests,
          petroleum products (glues and synthetics used in
          publishing), and other resources that are destroyed or
          over-extended on a daily basis, due to, not only the legal
          industry, but every industry has similar informational
          needs. The environmental impact - for once changing towards
          a positive shift - will be enormous.

          The library shelving space issues,
          photocopying expenses, etc... will all be changing
          drastically in the future due to these new technologies BUT
          and this is a big but - the technologies that
          are in their infancy now will soon be growing up at an
          alarming rate. Not only CDROM's but other, far more
          powerful storage devices are just around the corner with
          capacities that equal supercomputer access speeds and
          storage capacities that far surpass our largest file
          servers. In the library fields, we have the potential for
          directing some of that change as it relates to the
          business community so lest we all sit and complain
          retroactively about this product or that (though it's fun
          to flame vendors I agree!), I put forth the suggestion that
          we use our collectives (AALL, Norcall, etc...) to pull
          weight and make sure that the future belongs to real world
          decisions and not the spin drs. The fallacy that we need
          both paper and electronic versions of information is
          terribly misguided.

          For the proposed paperless office envisioned decades ago, I
          think that libraries, especially the legal and medical
          libraries that utilize materials that are always updated and
          propagate with the speed of hyperactive rodents, are ripe to
          direct and benefit from these changes.

          So.... what do YOU think?

          Laurence W. Davidson Information Specialist
          Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison ldavidson@brobeck.com
          One Market Plaza - Spear Tower (415) 979-2747 (Ph)
          San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 979-2966 (Phax)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 03/09/00 PST