I have had extensive and repeated correspondence with the staff Supreme
Court staff on this exact issue. I urge you to perhaps considering
writing to the Court on this issue.
To us it is and has benn obvious that such a list is required.
The players at the court are:
Jim Donavan, Data Systems (who has heard this from me upteen times)
Frank Wagner, Reporter of Decisions
William Suter, Clerk of the Court
So, it is not a nameless "they" that have not put up such a list. These
are the decision makers.
Alan Sugarman
President
HyperLaw
On Wed, 18 May 1994, Judith A. Kaul wrote:
> Peter Martin reported a load problem for CWRU's ftp site for
> the U.S. Supreme Court opinions. Though the ftp site files
> were unavailable, the files were available via CWRU's Free-Net
> telnet site.
>
> We at the law school have only recently begun to assist
> in verifying that all the opinions that should be received
> are posted. However, we have not been doing so this week
> due to the onset of some major construction here. One of the
> problems is that the court refuses to send a list of the files
> that are disseminated. They just send the opinions. So the
> folks who make sure they get loaded onto the net only find
> out after the fact if something is missing.
>
> Please feel free to notify me via e-mail if an opinion that
> should have been loaded is missing.
>
> I have forwarded Peter Martin's message to the people who
> administer the ftp site.
>
> Regards,
> Judith Kaul
> Technology/Reference Librarian
> Case Western Reserve University
> School of Law Library
> Internet: jak4@po.cwru.edu
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 03/09/00 PST