Gregg, I always, or almost always do, and my letter to the Wisconsin
Supreme Court sent last week makes full disclosure including HyperLaw's
participation in the litigation against West.
Now, I am waiting for those who have partaken of West's junkets and who
are consultants or have been consultants to discuss such, and also to
disclose to what extent they discussed their statements with West prior
to making them to the Wis. Sup. Ct.
Alan D. Sugarman
HyperLaw ®
sugarman@panix.com
On Mon, 27 Mar 1995, Koster wrote:
> On Mar. 27, Alan Sugarman wrote:
> >The Court did not ask any people providing statements if their >expenses
> were paid by a party-in-interest.
> in a posting signed:
> >Alan Sugarman
> >sugarman@panix.com
> >212-787-2812
>
> Before you attack others' failures of disclosure, it would be fitting to add
> a disclosure of your own interested status in your signature file (as of
> course you will do in your filings to the Wisconsin Supreme Court).
>
> Greg Koster
> CUNY Law School
> "No commercial interest other than a pair of matching, but equally tacky,
> Westlaw and Lexis coffee mugs"
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 03/09/00 PST