---------------------- Forwarded Message Follows ----------------------
Received: from po.CWRU.Edu by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (4.1/UCD2.05)
id AA18351; Mon, 19 Jul 93 14:41:20 PDT
Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON@po.CWRU.Edu>
Received: by po.CWRU.Edu (5.65b+ida+/CWRU-1.9)
id AA28380; Mon, 19 Jul 93 17:42:05 -0400 (from MAILER-DAEMON for law-lib-request@ucdavis.edu)
Message-Id: <9307192142.AA28380@po.CWRU.Edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 93 17:42:05 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@po.CWRU.Edu>
Subject: Returned mail: Cannot send message for 3 days
To: law-lib-request@ucdavis.edu
----- Transcript of session follows -----
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: from nextsun.INS.CWRU.Edu by po.CWRU.Edu with SMTP (5.65b+ida+/CWRU-1.9)
id AA29623; Fri, 16 Jul 93 17:02:58 -0400 (from law-lib-request@ucdavis.edu for lawadm@library.cpl.org)
Received: from ucdavis.ucdavis.edu by nextsun.INS.CWRU.Edu with SMTP (5.65b+ida+/CWRU-1.5.2-freenet-gw)
id AA25624; Fri, 16 Jul 93 15:34:51 -0400 (from law-lib-request@ucdavis.edu )
Received: by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (4.1/UCD2.05)
id AA08531; Fri, 16 Jul 93 11:42:47 PDT
Sender: law-lib-request@ucdavis.edu
Received: from router.mail.cornell.edu by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (4.1/UCD2.05)
id AA08324; Fri, 16 Jul 93 11:38:13 PDT
Received: from begbick.law.cornell.edu.law.cornell.edu ([132.236.108.7]) by router.mail.cornell.edu with SMTP id <576745-2>; Fri, 16 Jul 1993 14:38:59 -0400
Received: by begbick.law.cornell.edu.law.cornell.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA00292; Fri, 16 Jul 93 14:27:03 EDT
From: tom@begbick.law.cornell.edu (Thomas R. Bruce)
Message-Id: <9307161827.AA00292@begbick.law.cornell.edu.law.cornell.edu>
Subject: Law discussion lists
To: teknoids@fatty.law.cornell.edu
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1993 14:27:02 -0400
Cc: law-lib@ucdavis.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL15]
Lyo, David, etc.:
I'm in favor of as many substantive discussions as we can reasonably
create. I favor the "core group" approach which Lyo articulated for
one very simple reason: most faculty informed about LISTSERV
technology and shown examples of archived traffic (even from a
relatively high-level substantive discussion like CYBERLAW) say, "I
have too much to read already".
The trick is to create a list which is sufficiently fashionable as an
intellectual milieu that they'll feel left out academically if they
don't participate -- which argues for high-level colloquia appearing
to be sponsored by people regarded as peers or better in the existing
academic culture. So much for democracy.
Incidentally, I think (without evidence) that students may be even
harder sells than faculty, but for all the same reasons.
Regards,
Tb.
-- +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ | Thomas R. Bruce tom@law.mail.cornell.edu | | Research Associate | | Cornell Law School Voice: 607-255-1221 | | Myron Taylor Hall FAX: 607-255-7193 | | Ithaca, NY 14853 | +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 03/09/00 PST