Regarding Hein's superseded state statutes microfiche service:
Has anyone else noticed that Hein is not fiching the most current pocket
parts or supplements to the corresponding superseded fiched volume?
Does anyone know why there would be such discrepencies? Does anyone have
any opinions as to how important all this should be?---If it's really
important, then I could send our materials and the corresponding shipping
lists to Hein and ask them for an explanation.
Some Examples:
FICHED BOUND VOL. & NO. FICHED SUPPL. OUR PAPER SUPPL. NOT FICHED
FOR THAT VOL.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vernon's Missouri v.22 1952 1992
Missouri Rules of Ct. none 1989
Vernon's Rev.Civil Stat.
Texas v.10 1925 1986
Vernon's Rev.Civil Stat.
Texas v.10A 1969 1986
Vernon's Texas v.13A 1952 1986
Vernon's Rev.Civil Stat.
Texas v.21,21A,21B 1954 1971
Vernon's CrimCode Texas v.2 1966 1989
Vernon's Texas Codes Annot.
Water Code v.1 1972 1988
West's Louisiana v.4 1961 1990
Respond to me directly and I'll summarize to the list. I know how many
people will be waiting anxiously for the comments and results.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brian D. Striman Internet: brians@unllib.unl.edu
Head of Technical Services Bitnet: brians%unllib@unlvax1.bitnet
Catalog Librarian Office: 402-472-8286 // Fax: 472-8260
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Marvin & Virginia Schmid Law Library // University of Nebraska-Lincoln
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 03/09/00 PST